Marketing through the looking glass: The wearable AI shift

History rarely announces when an interface shift happens. It sneaks in through awkward prototypes and half-baked demos.

My generation is witness to Steve Ballmer laughing off the iPhone because it didn’t have a keyboard. And Meta’s stumble-filled demo of its AI glasses will likely be remembered the same way: clumsy on stage, but a seminal moment in the long, gradual evolution of wearable tech.

Because, for the first time, we’re moving from devices we look at to devices we look through. That sounds trivial, but it changes the rules of marketing entirely.

If the web trained us to fight for clicks, and mobile trained us to fight for swipes, wearables will train us to fight for glances. Attention stops being a choice you make with your thumb, and starts being something your eyes, head, and hands betray in real time.

This is not about Meta or Apple or whoever ships the best-looking glasses. It’s about what happens when wearables stop being gadgets and start becoming the primary interface. And for marketers, that means three fundamental shifts: the physics of attention, the texture of creativity, and the ethics of intimacy.

The physics of attention

Marketers are used to chasing explicit signals: the tap, the search, the purchase. Wearables will flood us with implicit ones. A gaze that lingers, a glance that darts away, a half-formed gesture: these are closer to body language than browsing history.

It’s tempting to treat every flicker of the eye as intent, but that’s a fast track to chaos. In human conversation, not every nod means agreement, not every pause means interest. The same will be true here.

 

 

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A post shared by Mark Zuckerberg (@zuck)

The challenge is to decide which signals are meaningful and which are noise. If clicks trained us to optimise for transactions, gaze will train us to read context.

Done well, this is powerful. Imagine a transit schedule popping up as you step toward your bus stop, or a reminder to reorder detergent triggered by a glance at an empty container.

Done badly, it’s the equivalent of someone tapping your shoulder every time your eyes wander. The difference between the two isn’t the tech itself, it’s the balance between intent and restraint.

The texture of creativity

We’ve spent the last decade in the attention economy, designing content to be ‘thumb-stopping’. Wearables demand something else: content that is ‘glanceable’.

Glanceable means the message is absorbed in half a second. It means a symbol, a tone, or a gesture carries the weight of a paragraph. It means designing for the edges of vision, not the centre. In practice, that might look like micro-animations, contextual cues, or a single word that shifts meaning when paired with gaze.

This isn’t the end of storytelling; it’s storytelling under new physics. The 30-second spot gave way to the six-second bumper. The six-second bumper will give way to the half-second glance. The creative challenge will be compressing meaning without flattening it.

And here’s the non-obvious bit: glanceability doesn’t just change advertising, it changes brand behaviour. If your message has to live in the periphery of someone’s daily life, it can’t afford to be too loud or needy.

The ethics of intimacy

And then, there’s the elephant in the room: trust. Smartphones already knew too much about us. Wearables will know more; where we’re looking, how we’re moving, maybe even what our bodies are signalling unconsciously.

But the lesson from every previous tech shift is clear: brands that overreach first are punished hardest later. The cookie wars taught us that. The notification fatigue of mobile phones taught us that.

So, what does ‘responsible’ look like here?

It looks like minimising data instead of hoarding it. It looks like making consent visible, not buried in legalese. It looks like giving users a clear value exchange; faster discovery, smoother interactions, less friction, in return for sharing their signals.

Marketers who see wearable AI as a license to capture every blink will lose trust quickly. The smarter play is to treat intimacy as a privilege. That means knowing when not to engage. In the ambient world, silence is as much a design choice as interruption.

When smartphones first arrived, marketers treated them as just smaller screens. It took years before mobile-first experiences—apps, push notifications, location-based services—redefined the field. Wearable AI will go through the same cycle, only faster.

The winners in wearable AI won’t be the brands that flood your vision. They’ll be the ones that design for presence without intrusion, help without hassle; the ones that know when to step forward, and arguably most importantly, when to step aside.

 - Jacob Joseph, vice president–data science, CleverTap.