Campaign India Team
Nov 24, 2009

Anant’s blog: Looking beyond IBN Lokmat in the attack

There have been reams written about the attack by Shiv Sena activists on the IBN Lokmat office in Mumbai.In an unusual show of solidarity, newspapers and news channels have all condemned the attack, with even The Times of India – always loth to mention a competitive media product – front-paging the attack story with a photograph.The Shiv Sena hit back saying the ‘media is not God’.

Anant’s blog: Looking beyond IBN Lokmat in the attack

There have been reams written about the attack by Shiv Sena activists on the IBN Lokmat office in Mumbai.

In an unusual show of solidarity, newspapers and news channels have all condemned the attack, with even The Times of India – always loth to mention a competitive media product – front-paging the attack story with a photograph.

The Shiv Sena hit back saying the ‘media is not God’.

That’s where all the media, in my opinion, missed a trick – by making the focus of the coverage an attack on the freedom of the press.

The moment this was done, all the protestations became self-serving, allowing the Shiv Sena to attack the media houses themselves.

And, in a way, these protestations are self-serving.

Political parties of all hue and colour have been in open defiance of the law for many years.

I was first exposed to it in 1968, when I was seven, studying in St. Xavier’s in Kolkata. The Chattra Parishad had called for a bandh, and our school defied the call. Chattra Parishad activists stormed into the school with sticks and stones and all manner of implements. Those students who lived close to the school, as I did, were in defiance of the call as well and went through a truly frightening two hour experience.

Of late, we’ve seen attacks on shops selling anything remotely connected to romance on Valentine’s Day, we’ve seen attacks on bars, pubs, restaurants, doctors, hospitals, colleges (for not admitting ‘recommended’ candidates) and so on.

The media reported on them.

And forgot about them.

The main issue here is the fact that political parties support and encourage their activists to break and flout the laws of the land.

Many laws, with many victims – not just media. It so happened, in this instance, that the ‘victim’ was a news channel.

The issue of the disdain with which political activists treat the law of the land is the one that needs to be discussed and debated – not the trampling of media freedom. The freedom of youth to visit pubs and bars and wear clothes of their choice is important too. The freedom of a businessman to have his signage only in English or Tamil or whatever language he chooses is important, too. The freedom for all to ignore a call for a bandh needs to be protected as well. The security of doctors and hospital and college administrators are paramount as well.

The list is endless.

And there’s no room for political parties to have half a comeback.

Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

2 hours ago

Moves and wins roundup: Week of 12 May

Our weekly roundup of the latest appointments and account wins news from Madison Media Alpha, EndemolShine India, Mediascope, Primex Media Services, and many more.

4 hours ago

CTV’s growing pains: Big spend, bigger blind spots

As connected TV becomes a media mainstay, marketers face a sharp paradox—rising ROI hopes, but murky metrics and mounting fraud risks.

4 hours ago

LinkedIn’s BrandLink bets on resonance over reach

Video may be B2B’s new darling, but LinkedIn’s BrandLink is selling context, not cheap clicks—marketers and publishers take note.

9 hours ago

Mystic Monk plots global leap with asset-light model

The independent ad agency is targeting the USA and UAE markets with a registered US business and planned Dubai office.