Campaign India Team
Dec 15, 2009

Anant’s blog: Farewell, Bajaj scooters

I, for one, am not going to mourn the death of the Bajaj scooter.The Bajaj scooter represented almost everything that was wrong in India during the period of dominance. It was a poor product, noisy, unsafe. Overall, the company cared little for the consumer, ensuring only that they sold as many scooters as possible while making as much profit as possible. For decades, protected by the license Raj, Bajaj had a monopoly on scooters. This caused, as the license Raj caused in any number of categories, an acute demand-supply gap which allowed a healthy black market to flourish.

Anant’s blog: Farewell, Bajaj scooters

I, for one, am not going to mourn the death of the Bajaj scooter.

The Bajaj scooter represented almost everything that was wrong in India during the period of dominance. It was a poor product, noisy, unsafe. Overall, the company cared little for the consumer, ensuring only that they sold as many scooters as possible while making as much profit as possible.

For decades, protected by the license Raj, Bajaj had a monopoly on scooters. This caused, as the license Raj caused in any number of categories, an acute demand-supply gap which allowed a healthy black market to flourish.

And the consumer was grateful that he could get his hands on a Bajaj, sometimes paying almost 50% premium on the list price.

And the scooter continued to be overpriced, continued to be unsafe.

In a funny way, I’m almost delighted that it died.

And that’s what makes the Bajaj story interesting. To shrug off the past and to learn to compete in a completely free market couldn’t have been easy. The motorcycle market is, today, a crowded one. And Bajaj woke up and grappled with competition. They acknowledged that the consumer mattered, that they had to meet consumer wants and needs in order to do well, in order, even, to simply survive.

Today, Bajaj dominates the mid-price segment, accounting for 6 out every 10 motorcycles sold in the country.

The Bajaj story is a rare one. There are a number of companies which dominated categories during the years of the license Raj, only to fritter away their considerable advantages. Hindustan Motors is one such, Premier Auto is another, Standard Motors is a third.

The difference with Bajaj was that the company woke up to see the writing on the wall. They saw that the rules of the game had changed, that the consumer was not a moron, that the consumer would walk away from a product or service that was sub-standard.

Heritage and age of the company matter little in the new environment.

At Campaign India, we’ve stubbornly refused to see merit in stories about anniversaries that PR agencies and marketers keep trying to convince us to carry.

What is the value to the consumer of a 10 year-old or 100 year-old company or brand that doesn’t care compared to a one day old brand that does?

Ask Bajaj. Once upon a time, you just couldn’t beat a Bajaj. Now, you can – but Bajaj doesn’t allow you to.

Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

3 hours ago

What I learnt about leadership from Piyush Pandey’s ...

Working alongside him was nothing short of a masterclass in humanity and advertising.

4 hours ago

Are ‘struggling’ agency groups dragging down ...

The company continues to invest heavily in AI through its new ‘to be determined’ (TBD) Lab, which remains in active hiring mode under Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang.

4 hours ago

Dentsu warns staff of data breach after Merkle hit ...

Email to staff says information, including bank and payroll number, salary, National Insurance number, and personal contact details have been taken.

5 hours ago

When AI turns to humans to feel human

Anthropic and OpenAI recently turned to human-led creative shops to tell their story. They didn't market AI's efficiency or speed, but empathy.