Campaign India Team
Aug 05, 2014

Procter & Gamble wields axe on up to 100 of its least profitable brands

Looks to streamline costs and focus on core brands

P&G CEO AG Lafley
P&G CEO AG Lafley

Procter & Gamble has announced that up to 100 of its least profitable brands will be axed as it looks to streamline its costs and focus on its core brands.

The FMCG giant, whose brands include Pampers, Ariel and Gillette, said that it will shed about 90 to 100 brands around the globe over the next year or two, leaving it with about 70 to 80 brands. It did not name which products it intends to keep but they will be organised into up to a dozen business units under "four focused industry areas".

According to P&G, its 70 to 80 leading brands accounted for 90% of its sales and 90% of its profit in the year to 30 June.

On a call with analysts, CEO AG Lafley said the strategy would create a new streamlined P&G "that will continue to grow faster and more sustainably, reliably create more value".

In June, P&G announced that it was axing the marketing director role across its entire portfolio of brands, and replacing this with brand directors.

Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

11 hours ago

Why Zee5’s language-first bet may be its best yet

As India’s OTT battle intensifies, the streaming platform goes hyperlocal with tech-backed storytelling and tier-2 targeting.

13 hours ago

Cannes Lions, AI, and the integrity reckoning

The first ever Cannes Lions Grand Prix withdrawal for AI misuse signals a watershed moment, but is this just the beginning of a much bigger reckoning for marketing in the AI age?

15 hours ago

India isn’t a muse; it’s time to brand the maker

Global brands borrowed India’s craft. Sam & Andy’s founding partner claims that Indian creators must now reclaim the narrative—with better systems, sharper storytelling, and unapologetic ownership.