Raahil Chopra
May 15, 2019

I-Com Global Summit 2019: 'Controversy is good around elections'

Tom de Bruyne, founder, Sue Amsterdam and Behavioural Design Academy, explained how the ruling party in the Netherlands stayed in power post the elections in 2017

I-Com Global Summit 2019: 'Controversy is good around elections'
Tom de Bruyne, founder, Sue Amsterdam and Behavioural Design Academy, Netherlands, gave the example of the 2017 elections in the country as an example of how behavioural science and data science helped the incumbent government regain power in the country.
 
Setting the context of the elections, de Bruyne, said, “We had a problem. The opposition party (PVV) headed by Geert Wilders had 44 seats. The current ruling party (VVD) headed by prime minister Mark Rutte had only 19. Several VVD MP’s were involved in scandals. There was negative sentiment around the Dutch PM. People didn’t like him and trust him anymore. This was at a time when the whole world was watching the Netherlands. It was soon after Trump and Brexit.”
 
He added, “Geert Wilders outsmarted every other politician in shaping public discourse by perfectly playing the populist playbook. He looked to make enemies big. He was framing the ruling government and framing us as the elite and exploiting fear for immigrants. He was hijacking the media algorithm. Outrage drives attention and reach. Reach drives market share. They asked voters and easy question to answer in the voting booth. Populists understand how decision making works, moderates don’t. Populists are selling the leader while moderates are selling the program.” 
 
He then explained how the ruling party decided to go ‘counter-populist’. 
 
"You basically try to figure what the populists were doing to influence the hearts and the minds of people. We experimented with things. People forget. The elections are decided upon in the last two weeks. We figured what triggered anger, public debate and excitement. Controversy is good around elections. It doesn't matter if people are outraged. It gives you constant opportunity to be there and push the message," said de Bruyne.
 
He added, "In the end you need to back to the same question - all the leaders who are going to protect you and keep the country stable. That's always the question you need to answer. The mistake people make during elections (and even marketing conferences) is use abstract words. This makes it harder. You must speak directly to the minds of your target audience in the language they understand."
 
He ended his talk by stating, "People don't always want solutions, but just make sure you understand their problem. Stuff like 'building that wall', doesn't help."
 
The Dutch election ended with the incumbent party coming back in power.
Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

2 hours ago

WPP global comms boss Chris Wade steps down

Former Ogilvy UK CEO Michael Frohlich will replace Wade, who leaves the holding company after 13 years.

4 hours ago

Cookies crumble, privacy prevails: Marketing’s new ...

The era of lazy personalisation is over. Epsilon senior vice president for analytics believes that marketers must now trade third-party tracking for first-party trust, clean data, and cultural transparency—or risk fading into irrelevance.

23 hours ago

Why Zee5’s language-first bet may be its best yet

As India’s OTT battle intensifies, the streaming platform goes hyperlocal with tech-backed storytelling and tier-2 targeting.

1 day ago

Cannes Lions, AI, and the integrity reckoning

The first ever Cannes Lions Grand Prix withdrawal for AI misuse signals a watershed moment, but is this just the beginning of a much bigger reckoning for marketing in the AI age?